In Domestic Affairs

Helen Rush

The £5 billion benefit squeeze: Inside controversial welfare overhaul

The £5 billion benefit squeeze: Inside controversial welfare overhaul

The government has announced significant reforms to the welfare system, targeting disability and health-related benefits, though it has been forced to scale back some of its original plans following a rebellion within the Labour Party. The proposed changes, outlined in the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill, aim to reshape the eligibility criteria for financial support while addressing concerns over the sustainability of rising welfare costs. Initially, the reforms would have affected both existing and new claimants of Personal Independence Payment (PIP) and the health element of Universal Credit, but after pressure from over 100 Labour MPs, ministers confirmed that current recipients would be shielded from cuts, with changes applying only to new applicants from 2026 onwards.

The reforms come against a backdrop of rapidly escalating expenditure on working-age health and disability benefits, which has surged from £36 billion in 2019 to £52 billion in 2024. Without intervention, projections suggest this could rise to £66 billion by 2029, prompting the government to seek savings of £5 billion annually by the end of the decade. Key measures include tightening PIP eligibility by requiring claimants to score at least four points on one daily living activity, a move expected to exclude around 800,000 people from receiving the benefit by 2029-30. Additionally, the health top-up payment for new Universal Credit claimants will be halved to £50 per week, though those with the most severe lifelong conditions will be exempt from reassessments and receive enhanced support.

Critics argue that the reforms risk creating a two-tier system, where existing claimants retain more generous entitlements while new applicants face stricter criteria and reduced payments. Some Labour MPs have warned this could deepen inequalities, though the government has countered by accelerating a £1 billion employment support package originally slated for 2029, aiming to help disabled individuals and those with health conditions transition into work. The Work Capability Assessment will also be scrapped, replaced by a single assessment based on PIP criteria, intended to streamline the process and reduce bureaucratic hurdles.

Despite concessions, dissent persists. Backbenchers and disability advocates maintain that the changes lack proper consultation and could push vulnerable individuals into poverty.

Official estimates suggest up to 250,000 people, including 50,000 children, may fall into relative poverty by 2030 due to the reforms, though the government disputes higher figures cited by think tanks.

The Prime Minister has defended the overhaul as necessary to preserve the welfare system for future generations, emphasising that without reform, the current trajectory is financially unsustainable.

The legislation, now amended, is set for further parliamentary scrutiny, with debates expected to highlight tensions between fiscal discipline and social protection. While ministers insist the reforms balance compassion with economic realism, the opposition frames the changes as ideologically driven cuts that undermine support for the most vulnerable. The outcome of upcoming votes will determine whether additional adjustments are made, but the government’s revised approach signals a precarious compromise between its austerity goals and internal party dissent.